Re: UAs passing tests if they don't implement a feature

On 20/06/12 19:03, fantasai wrote:
> Not refs make this relatively easy for many tests.

But in general we don't want to use not refs, as they don't test whether 
you get something expected, just that you don't get one thing. (They 
have near-∞ passing conditions, not 1.)

-- 
Geoffrey Sneddon — Opera Software
<http://gsnedders.com>
<http://opera.com>

Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2012 19:13:03 UTC