- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:19:20 -0700
- To: "Gérard Talbot" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Cc: Public CSS test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Thursday 2012-07-26 22:27 -0400, "Gérard Talbot" wrote: > Hello, > > [RC6] > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/white-space-processing-056.htm > > [nightly-unstable] > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/white-space-processing-056.htm > > As far as I can see this, Firefox 4.0.1 under XP SP3, Firefox 14.0.1 > under Linux KDE 4.8.4, Firefox 17.0.1a (nightly build 20120726) under XP > SP3 and Safari 5.1.7 under XP SP3 fail such test. > > The submitted implementation reports suggests otherwise. > > I think the pass/fail conditions sentence is written in a way that is > not so clear. What's a box? If an irregular polygon can be a "box", then > it's a pass.. What behavior do you see? I don't think the Ahem font provides a glyph for ideographic space, so it seems that you'd get a glyph from a different font -- and I could imagine the results being substantially different depending on which font, and whether that font has an ideographic space that's exactly 1em wide. (I see a 1px gap in the middle of what "should be" a single box, but nothing out of alignment.) -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Saturday, 11 August 2012 22:19:46 UTC