- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 07:59:55 -0400
- To: "Florian Rivoal" <florianr@opera.com>
- Cc: "Public CSS testsuite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Le Jeu 2 août 2012 8:22, Florian Rivoal a écrit : > Hi, > > I've submitted a few TCs for @supports in > contributors/opera/submitted/css3-conditional/ http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/opera/submitted/css3-conditional/ Florian, The nr 1 problem I see right now with those 33 tests is that 19 of them will pass in browsers which have no implemention of @supports conditional rule. So, these 19 tests have limited relevance, worthiness and weak trustworthiness. They could be improved to be more specific, better targeted; in some tests, I do not know right now how they could be reworked, improved to detect non-implementation of @supports. Ideally, tests should fail when there is an incorrect implementation, when there is a partial/incomplete implementation or when there is an absence of implementation. " The test will not pass inadvertently " CSS Test Review Checklist: Test Design http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/review-checklist#test-design Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Saturday, 4 August 2012 12:00:24 UTC