- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:52:04 -0400
- To: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
- Cc: "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>
Le Ven 21 octobre 2011 14:47, "Gérard Talbot" a écrit : > > Le Mer 7 septembre 2011 18:12, "Gérard Talbot" a écrit : >> Arron, >> > > > >> [RC6] >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/vertical-align-117.htm >> >> [nightly-unstable] >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/vertical-align-117.htm >> >> [RC6] >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/vertical-align-117.htm >> >> [nightly-unstable] >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/vertical-align-118.htm >> >> When the set height of line box is the height of the font, then >> 'vertical-align: text-bottom' and 'vertical-align: bottom' are by >> definition (positioned) the same: the bottom of the line box is given >> by >> the bottommost point of glyphs (like descenders of p, q, y, j glyphs) >> of >> the font. Same thing with text-top and top. >> >> What I am trying to say here is that vertical-align values >> text-bottom, >> text-top, bottom and text-bottom should be tested where/when the >> line-height is greater than the font-size. So that top half-leading >> and >> bottom half-leading are not 0. So that such values give different >> rendered layout, different vertical values. So that vertical-align >> values text-bottom, text-top, bottom and text-bottom show and >> demonstrate differences. Otherwise, it is not a well targeted >> testcase, >> even for a basic testing of vertical-align values text-bottom, >> text-top, >> bottom and text-bottom. >> >> I suggest a line-height of 3em: that way, fractional pixel (for top >> half-leading and bottom half-leading) are avoided, top is >> predictable/predicted to be 1em further toward the top of text-top, >> bottom is predictable/predicted to be 1em further toward the bottom of >> text-bottom. > > Hello all, > > I will submit later (probably next week) these 2 testcases (hopefully > along with others on vertical-align and line-height): > > CSS Test: 'vertical-align: text-bottom' - line-height > http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/vertical-align-117a.html > (draft for now) > > CSS Test: 'vertical-align: text-top' - line-height > http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/vertical-align-118a.html > (draft for now) > > > Right now, Firefox 7.0.1, Opera 11.52, Chrome 14.0.835.202, Safari 5.1.1 > and Konqueror 4.7.2 pass these vertical-align-11[7|8]a testcases while > IE8 and IE9 fail. Argh... Forgot to say and wanted to add that Opera 11.52 fails http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/vertical-align-117a.html Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 18:52:34 UTC