- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:07:58 -0400
- To: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Hello all, [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/text-decoration-087.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/text-decoration-087.htm Chrome 6.0.472.63 and Safari 5.0.2 respective Implementation Reports (back in october 2010) stated they pass text-decoration-087 but this is most likely incorrect and an error in understanding or in reading the pass conditions of the testcase. (I am also double-checking IE9's result for such test). http://test.csswg.org/harness/details/CSS21_RC6/text-decoration-087/ http://test.csswg.org/harness/details/CSS21_DEV/text-decoration-087/ Proposed replacement for such test ---------------------------------- http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/text-decoration-087.html That way, the pass conditions sentence will be much more clearer, quicker to read and less prone to misunderstanding or interpretation. Also, the orange line should be thicker thanks to font-size: 3em. regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 19:08:27 UTC