- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:09:34 -0700
- To: "Arron Eicholz" <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Arron, http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/max-width-080.htm (RC6) http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/max-width-080.htm http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10/max-width-080.xht As coded and with the current pass/fail condition, the testcase can not fail, in particular for user agents which do not support max-width property. Eg. IE5 would pass such testcase. So far, I would say the same for all other max-width testcases targeting a one value of an unit: "Max-width using [some unit name] with a minimum plus one value, 1[unit]" E.g.: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10/max-width-058.xht can not fail, will always pass. Same thing with max-height with a minimum of plus one value. The way they are coded makes it impossible for the testcases to fail, even in browsers/user agents which do not support max-[height|width] property. In order for all these testcases to be stricter, more demanding, the testcases need, say, an overlapped red rectangle or a nearby measurement ruler. regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2011 20:10:10 UTC