Re: page-break-before-008 looks invalid

On 10/17/2010 06:17 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Sunday 2010-10-17 18:13 -0700, L. David Baron wrote:
>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/page-break-before-004.htm
>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/xhtml1/page-break-before-004.xht
>> look invalid.  I think the element with 'page-break-before: always'
>> should force the content to a second page and leave a blank first
>> page.
>
> The same problem seems to be present in:
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/page-break-before-008.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/xhtml1/page-break-before-008.xht

Fixed:
   http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/hp/submitted/css2.1/page/page-break-before-008.xht

The UA is allowed to suppress the generation of content-empty pages (except for
those generated by 'left' and 'right' forced breaks), so it is uncertain whether
the test prints one or two pages. However, it should now pass with either
behavior.

~fantasai

Received on Monday, 25 October 2010 01:53:43 UTC