- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:49:16 -0700
- To: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On 10/18/2010 06:57 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug wrote: > On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:09:22 +0200, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> > wrote: > >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/border-collapse-inherited-001.xht >> >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/border-collapse-inherited-001.htm >> >> >> These tests make invalid assumptions about the UA style sheet; in >> particular that it does not have the rule: >> table { border-collapse: separate } > (...) >> This test should be removed. > > I guess it could also have another div between the #container and the > table, and then > > table { border-collapse: inherit } That's a good idea. It could also use an alternate path with <div>-based tables, which should not be affected by such reset rules. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 23 October 2010 07:49:51 UTC