- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 03:06:30 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, "Bruno Fassino" <fassino@gmail.com>, "Hilbrand Edskes" <hilbrand@edskes.com>
> Once issue-159 is addressed, these tests: > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/margin-collapse-036.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/margin-collapse-036.xht will become invalid because the internal contradiction in the spec will have been fixed. (The contradiction was that in this case: > <div id="a" style="min-height: 100px"> > <div id="b"></div> > </div> > the spec said that the top and bottom margin of "a" were not > adjoining, but that all the consecutive pairs of margins (top-a > top-b, top-b bottom-b, bottom-b bottom-a) were adjoining, which > aren't simultaneously possible.) > The current proposal for that issue is here: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0684.html David, I have removed margin-collapse-036 from my directory: Revision version 1505 +CC: Bruno Fassino, Hilbrand Edskes regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (RC2; October 1st 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Saturday, 16 October 2010 10:07:05 UTC