- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:57:53 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
> The pass conditions of the tests > background-root-004/005/006/007/008/009/010/013 incorrectly imply or > require that the background of the root element does not extend > outside the root element's border. The wording varies; in some > cases it caused me to mark the test as failing and in some cases it > didn't. But I think it should be improved in all of these cases. Everywhere in those testcases, the expressions "This is the BODY.", "an HTML box" should be replaced otherwise removed. "a green border" would be better replaced with "bright green border" or even with an entirely different, other color like yellow. Some wording are wrong: "This is should be a box" http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-root-005.htm "This is should be a box that is green with a green border. This box should be in another green box" : this is confusing as far as nested green boxes are involved. A green box in another green box: how would my neighbour (or anyone) be sure of that just by looking at the page? http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-root-005.htm "showing through the tiled background of the box surrounding it." http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-root-007.htm I would suggest here to recuperate, to reuse the expression "bathroom tiles" (or even better "white bathroom tiles") from other testcases which seems natural, intuitive, meaningful and overall good for these kinds of testcases. The testcases http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-root-006.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-root-007.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-root-008.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-root-009.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-root-010.htm should have <meta name="flags" content="image"> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-root-013.htm should have <meta name="flags" content="image interact"> regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (RC2; October 1st 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 03:58:33 UTC