- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 15:18:07 -0700
- To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>
> There is a new wiki page to help us track issues: > http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/issues > Please help us track error reports there! > > The following tests have significant substantive changes: > absolute-non-replaced-width-008 > absolute-non-replaced-width-009 (...) http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/absolute-non-replaced-width-008.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/absolute-non-replaced-width-009.htm The title, the assert, the expected results and the code design of those absolute-non-replaced-width-008 , 009 are still wrong, incorrect. The only change I see is that #div1 is now width: 3in; > display-applies-to-002 (...) http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/display-applies-to-002.htm That testcase has not been updated or corrected as far as I can see. <abbr> is already, by default and by the spec, an inline element. So, the testcase does not test what it meant to test to begin with. I have proposed a replacement for display-applies-to-002.htm > left-091 > left-092 (...) left-091 and left-092 are now better but I think the testcases should not be creating unexpectedly an horizontal scrollbar. > position-relative-nested-001 (...) http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/position-relative-nested-001.htm The proposed replacement was adopted ... but now the original/initial test assert does not make sense. The code I provided was incidently demonstrating that 'background-position: center center;' is not the same as (and can not be considered as an equivalent of) 'top: 50%' or 'bottom: 50%;' or 'top: -50%' or 'bottom: 50%'. Relative positioning will position *the top of* padding-box at 50% while background-position will position *in the middle of* the padding box at 50%. > The following tests were renamed: > dinamic-pseudo-classes-* to dynamic-pseudo-classes-* > counter-reset-increment-002 was renamed from something http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/counter-reset-increment-002.htm was inspired by http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/css/box/list/list-style-type/002.html and by http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/list-style-type-017.htm regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (RC2; October 1st 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Sunday, 3 October 2010 22:18:43 UTC