More test feedback

active-selector-002
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/active-selector-002.htm
Test does not state whether visible red is a failure. It's unclear what "these links" refers to.

background-alpha-001
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-alpha-001.htm
It's not possible to judge whether the alpha PNS is being rendered correctly, so the test is not self-documenting. Plus it makes me go blind.

background-alpha-002
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-alpha-002.htm
background-alpha-003
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-alpha-003.htm
background-alpha-004
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-alpha-004.htm
background-alpha-005
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-alpha-005.htm
Similar to above; hard to know what correct rendering is.

background-attachment-004
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-attachment-004.htm
Crazy test that is hard to judge. Not obvious what "flashes" should look like

background-position-201
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-position-201.htm
States "the diamond should be moving around the edge of the outer circle", but there is no outer circle visible

background-root-018
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-root-018.htm
Text is virtually unreadable

bidi-override-003
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/bidi-override-003.htm
It should state whether a bullet should be visible.

border-001
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/border-001.htm
Solid box or empty box?

c525-font-wt-000
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/c525-font-wt-000.htm
Does not state whether "This sentence should be very light" should be visibly lighter than normal.

c527-font-001
c527-font-002
c527-font-004
c527-font-005
c527-font-007
c527-font-008
c527-font-009
c527-font-10
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/c527-font-001.htm et al.
These tests include words like "there should be 36px between lines". The tests need a reference marker of some kind to allow this to be judged.

c5526c-display-000
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/c5526c-display-000.htm
What am I supposed to do with this test? It needs a reference, if that's the point.

character-encoding-026
character-encoding-027
character-encoding-028
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/character-encoding-026.htm et al
Missing the http flag?

fixed-table-layout-006
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/fixed-table-layout-006.htm
What does "all the blue lines" refer to? They are all different shades of blue.

font-weight-bolder-001
font-weight-lighter-001
font-weight-normal-001
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/font-weight-bolder-001.htm et al.
These tests refer to various "CSSTest Weights" fonts that are not included with the suite, and I see no other references to.

inline-block-003
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/inline-block-003.htm
Like floats-126 etc, needs to say what should happen on window resize. Has a typo: "rustulting".

inlines-003
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/inlines-003.htm
Not self-describing (what should happen on resize?).

inlines-004
inlines-005
inlines-006
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/inlines-004.htm et al.
"The paragraph of Xs below should remain perfectly aligned." Aligned with what? I think it means that the Xs should always lie on a grid.

lang-selector-005
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/lang-selector-005.htm
Missing the http flag?

margin-collapse-160
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/margin-collapse-160.htm
Should say that the first page is blank and 3 pages are expected (if, indeed, that is the intent).

page-break-margins-000
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/page-break-margins-000.htm
Test contains "[[UNFINISHED]]"

text-transform-bicameral-009
text-transform-bicameral-010
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/text-transform-bicameral-009.htm
I think this test should attempt to specify a font that contains the glyphs on commons OSes. I have no idea what font name to enter to get the correct glyphs on Mac OS X.

I have entered these notes in the wiki:
<http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/issues>

Simon

Received on Sunday, 3 October 2010 20:38:49 UTC