- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:12:47 -0800
- To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
> On 02/27/2009 05:12 PM, Arron Eicholz wrote: >> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/html4/t100304-c43-rpl-bbx-00-d-g.htm >> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/html4/t100304-c43-rpl-bbx-01-d-g.htm 2 small other points with those "a big teal square half the width of the window" tests. 1- If we apply a strict formalisation to the test as is, then a machine's verdict would be that the test is failed (all the time) since the teal square does not include the aqua border surrounding it. 2- The test should be robust enough to even invite testers to resize their user agent viewport. The pass condition should still be true if the tester resizes his/her window. In which case, the test should state this explicitly and the interact flag should be added. regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (pre-alpha): http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/html4/ CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Monday, 25 January 2010 19:13:22 UTC