- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:33:48 -0800
- To: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On 02/27/2009 04:50 PM, Arron Eicholz wrote: > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/html4/t0801-c412-hz-box-00-b-a.htm > > The test uses an object element to render a PNG file. However, plug-ins > may render this element and the plug-ins may or may not respect the > intrinsic size of the image. For example, if QuickTime is your registered > PNG viewer, rendering is different than if QuickTime is not registered. > To eliminate the possible conflict with plug-ins the case needs to be > simplified and needs to use an img element. I don't think it should matter whether the <img> or <object> tag is used here, but since it doesn't matter I've switched the test to use <img>. http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/archive/raw-tests/css1tests/css1test412a.xml Please let me know if this is ok. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 23 January 2010 00:58:10 UTC