- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:04:48 -0800
- To: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On 02/27/2009 04:20 PM, Arron Eicholz wrote: > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/html4/content-counter-004.htm > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/html4/content-counters-004.htm > > This test compares the glyph used for a square counter style with the U+25FE. However, CSS2.1 12.5.1 [1] states: > > "Glyphs are specified with disc, circle, and square. Their exact rendering depends on the user agent." > > CSS3 Lists, 4.1 [2] suggests - but does not require - U+25A0, U+25FC or U+25FE for squares. > > In order for this test to pass, we believe both of the following are required: > 1. Like CSS3 Lists, CSS2.1 specifies which glyph(s) are appropriate for counter styles; > 2. The test compares against all suggested/allowed glyphs and requires the user agent to match one of them. > > Otherwise, a user agent can fail this test and still comply with CSS2.1. This test case should be updated or removed from the test suite. > > The test also uses the word 'approximately' this does not allow for easy pass/fail indication. Recommend removing the word and making the statement more explicit. I've updated the tests: http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/src/generate/content-counter-002.xht http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/src/generate/content-counter-003.xht http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/src/generate/content-counter-004.xht ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2010 22:05:20 UTC