- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 11:41:10 -0700
- To: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
L. David Baron wrote: > On Saturday 2008-05-03 08:50 -0700, fantasai wrote: >> Ok, I'm adding two flags to the list: >> >> rec >> Behavior tested is RECOMMENDED, but not REQUIRED. [RFC2119] >> optional >> Behavior tested is preferred but OPTIONAL. [RFC2119] (These tests >> must be reviewed by a test suite owner or peer.) > > rec could easily be confused with the W3C REC (Recommendation) > status. > > I prefer should and may given that the spec-writing community tends > to refer to these requirement levels as shoulds and mays. Ok, changed. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 3 May 2008 18:41:48 UTC