- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 08:40:19 -0700
- To: "Bonner, Matt (IPG)" <matt.bonner@hp.com>
- CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Bonner, Matt (IPG) wrote: > Thinking about how the SHOULD tests will help might offer > guidance for how to name them. > > Obviously, these tests serve to see how UA's are doing; the > question that seems interesting to consider is what people > will conclude based on the results. > > For example, if the results will guide decisions on which > SHOULD items should get promoted to MUST or dropped to MAY, > a flag name suggesting that idea seems helpful. > > How do people expect testing SHOULD requirements to help? I think the main goal is to drive interoperability on implementing the SHOULD requirements. Dropping SHOULD requirements based on non-implementation is also a possibility, but something we want to avoid. :) ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 3 May 2008 15:40:56 UTC