- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 04:07:24 +1100
- To: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Robert Stam <robert@tallcomponents.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Arron Eicholz wrote: > fantasai wrote: > >> As Anne points out, all of these tests need to validate as XHTML. >> If they are testing invalid CSS, then they shouldn't pass the >> *CSS* validator, but they do need to validate as XHTML. Robert's >> suggetion of using a CDATA section would be the easiest way to >> fix the tests where CSS data is tripping up the XML parser. > > I agree that cases should validate but there are some exceptions. > when the case is flagged HTMLonly it doesn't necessarily have > to validate as XHTML does it? Those cases might not validate > for XHTML. There could be all sorts of deprecated attributes > and tags in there that might not allow XHTML to validate > but would be perfectly fine in HTML. > > Thanks, > Arron Eicholz If the markup is like as you described you should be using a XHTML traditional Doctype. Then the markup would pass validation. Alan
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 17:08:43 UTC