Arron Eicholz wrote: > fantasai wrote: > >> As Anne points out, all of these tests need to validate as XHTML. >> If they are testing invalid CSS, then they shouldn't pass the >> *CSS* validator, but they do need to validate as XHTML. Robert's >> suggetion of using a CDATA section would be the easiest way to >> fix the tests where CSS data is tripping up the XML parser. > > I agree that cases should validate but there are some exceptions. > when the case is flagged HTMLonly it doesn't necessarily have > to validate as XHTML does it? Those cases might not validate > for XHTML. There could be all sorts of deprecated attributes > and tags in there that might not allow XHTML to validate > but would be perfectly fine in HTML. > > Thanks, > Arron Eicholz If the markup is like as you described you should be using a XHTML traditional Doctype. Then the markup would pass validation. AlanReceived on Friday, 4 April 2008 17:08:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:13 UTC