- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:23:59 +0200
- To: "Arron Eicholz" <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>, "Robert Stam" <robert@tallcomponents.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
- Cc: "Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com" <'Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com'>
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:17:25 +0200, Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com> wrote: > Robert Stam wrote: >> Chapter_4\bad-selector.htm: do not include & in css style, because it >> will be >> an incorrect entity, use CDATA section. >> Chapter_4\invalid-decl-at-rule-001.htm: do not include & in css style, >> because >> it will be an incorrect entity, use CDATA section. >> Chapter_4\escaped-ident-001.htm: '&' character should be escaped in id. >> Chapter_4\escaped-ident-spaces-001.htm: '&' character should be escaped >> in id. >> Chapter_12\before-location-001.htm: incorrect '<' character. >> Chapter_14\Properties\Background-repeat\background-repeat-005.htm: </p> >> missing >> Chapter_16\white-space-009.htm: [nowrap] attribute may not be placed in >> XHTML. >> Chapter_16\white-space-011.htm: [wrap] attribute may not be placed in >> XHTML. > > Chapter_4\bad-selector.htm: is flagged as invalid and does not need to > validate > Chapter_4\invalid-decl-at-rule-001.htm: is flagged as invalid and does > not need to validate > Chapter_4\escaped-ident-001.htm: This case now flagged as invalid > Chapter_4\escaped-ident-spaces-001.htm: This case now flagged as invalid > Chapter_12\before-location-001.htm: '<' character is now properly > changed to < > Chapter_14\Properties\Background-repeat\background-repeat-005.htm: <p> > tag is now closed properly > Chapter_16\white-space-009.htm: attribute corrected to be valid HTML but > case is flagged as HTMLonly. > Chapter_16\white-space-011.htm: case correct to be valid. Attribute > removed. Note that flagging them as invalid doesn't help if they're actual XML files as they would simply not parse. That would also mean they can't be used in the CSS test case framework which requires well-formed tests. > These changes will be in our next release of test files. Thank you for > submitting these issues. Any chance you guys can give us an ETA? Since you already released these tests, just updating the public ones per your comments here shouldn't be too much trouble, right? ;-) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 22:24:36 UTC