- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:14:17 -0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:50:05 +0200, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> This is an explicitly-listed assumption: >> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/ > > I would recommend just adding other "assumptions" there as you come > across them rather than changing the tests. The test suite should be minimizing the number of assumptions. An HTML style sheet with 'border-collapse: collapse' as the default for <table> elements is perfectly reasonable. It might not be the right decision for a UA aiming to be a popular web browser, but not all CSS UAs are aiming at that and the CSS2.1 test suite should accommodate them, too. >>> It makes sense to me that if you run the CSS testsuite you have the >>> "Web defaults" set. >> >> We're not testing "Web defaults" support here, we're testing CSS2.1 >> support. See also >> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/testsuitedocumentation.html#testthetech > > That doesn't seem applicable here. It does. The exact contents of an HTML default style sheet is not a testable part of the CSS2.1 specification. There's an informative sample style sheet, but it's there as an example, not as a recommendation or a requirement. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 29 October 2007 16:14:32 UTC