Re: page-break-before proposed tests

Edits have been made.


Michael Turnwall
mturnwall@revenution.com
www.revenution.com



On Sep 26, 2007, at 8:26 AM, fantasai wrote:

>
> Michael Turnwall wrote:
>> Here's some more paged media tests.
> >
>> *page-break-before: always*
>> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page- 
>> break-before-always-03-a.xht
>
> As with the last set, I'd remove the .dummy class from the first  
> sentence.
>
>> *page-break-before: auto*
>> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page- 
>> break-before-auto-04-a.xht
>
> I'd change the sentences here to match those in the equivalent  
> after test case:
>   "There must not be a page break after this line of text."
>   "This sentence must be on the first page."
>
>> *page-break-before: (inline elements)*
>> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page- 
>> break-before-inline-05-a.xht
>
> Use the same text here as in the auto test case.
>
>> *page-break-before: (invalid syntax)*
>> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page- 
>> break-before-invalid-syntax-14-a.xht
>
> This test is incorrect, same problems as the equivalent -after test.
> Also, please add the 'invalid' flag.
>
>> *page-break-before: (no inherit)*
>> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page- 
>> break-before-no-inherit-12-a.xht
>
> I'd change the text to use the same text as the equivalent -after  
> test.
> (Also remove the dummy class from the non-dummy last sentence in  
> both tests.)
>
> ~fantasai
>