Arron Eicholz wrote: > I'm not sure if you saw Melinda's email > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2007AprJun/0435.html. I don't > believe we came to any conclusion in the meeting that we wanted some sort of > meta element like this. I know our team feels like it would be beneficial to > the test suite. Yes, our next telecon is on Tuesday, so we'll discuss it then. It's quite likely that the WG will agree that it's ok to add it. > We currently went with what was suggested in Melinda's mail for our tests > since it seemed reasonable and met our needs. I don't see anything really > wrong with the element as she described it. I think we should have it in the > template since it provides additional information for what the test is > completely testing. We will need to describe how to use it and clearly state, > that it should not be a copy of the title or a heading from the spec. If you have the information already, put it in a <meta name="assert" content="TEST ASSERTION"/> for now, as that's the most likely format we'll use. (I already added this to the template for CSS3 Paged Media, which actually has a test assertions list.) ~fantasaiReceived on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 23:38:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:12 UTC