돼지말린효과 wrote: > >> That said, I don't see any statement in CSS2.1 that backs up this test, so >> it is invalid and should be removed. Thanks for bringing it up. > > Thank you for your answer. > > I have another question. > > How do you know that this test is invalid and should be removed? Because there is no sentence in the spec, that I can see, that would justify the assertion the test is making. > Is it a w3c's policy? To have a correct test suite rather than an incorrect one? I should hope so. ~fantasaiReceived on Thursday, 21 June 2007 18:41:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:12 UTC