- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:44:08 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Peter Sorotokin <psorotok@adobe.com>
- Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Peter Sorotokin wrote: > > What is incorrect in this test is that it makes an assumption on where > the border of the inline element should occur (it relies on the border > exactly overlapping red characters in the previous line). Border > location in the vertical direction depends on the dimensions of the > content area of the element and the height of the inline element content > area is explicitly left undefined in the current draft of CSS 2.1 > (section 10.6.1). Ah, yes, indeed. As noted in one of the other threads, the tests make several assumptions (like this one) in order to test certain hard-to-test aspects of CSS. Is the assumption here one that is inconsistent with your implementation? I can look into the feasibility of marking tests that make assumptions of this nature, if you think that would help. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 17:44:25 UTC