- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:01:42 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29594
Bug ID: 29594
Summary: Clarification of font-variant-ligatures CSSOM
serialized read values
Product: CSS
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Fonts
Assignee: jdaggett@mozilla.com
Reporter: drott@chromium.org
QA Contact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
Target Milestone: ---
The CSSOM describes the CSS wide serialization steps, including the
serialization of shorthand properties.
https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/#serialize-a-css-value
In it:
"To serialize a CSS component value depends on the component, as follows:"
This list does not contain any font, or font variant specific rules, so it
seems like we are missing a clarification for what should be the canonical
serialization of font-variant-ligatures.
When writing to the fontVariantLigatures style property, or when specifying a
font-variant-ligatures style attribute in a CSS style declaration, and
specifying "none" as the value, the serialization for the read value could be
either
* "none" or
* "no-common-ligatures no-discretionary-ligatures no-historical-ligatures
no-contextual".
Which should be the canonical serialized value? How can we incorporate this
clarification into the spec? Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 25 April 2016 12:01:44 UTC