- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:07:00 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26470 Bug ID: 26470 Summary: Clarify behavior for gradientTransform and patternTransform Product: CSS Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Transforms Assignee: smfr@me.com Reporter: ed@opera.com QA Contact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ayg@aryeh.name, cmarrin@apple.com, dino@apple.com, dschulze@adobe.com, eoconnor@apple.com, smfr@me.com I found http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transforms/#svg-gradient-transform-pattern-transform slightly confusing, as normally presentation attributes can be specified on any svg element (see https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/intro.html#TermPresentationAttribute). It seems the desire here is to break that convention, and regardless of the intention the behavior needs to be specified - to explicitly call out the difference(s) to other presentation attributes AND/OR to specify the order in which transform, patternTransform and gradientTransform are mapped if they're all specified on the same element. It's possible that the SVG2 spec will need to be updated as well, see https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/styling.html#UsingPresentationAttributes, since with the section in the Transforms spec a given presentation attribute and the corresponding property may no longer share the same name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2014 12:07:01 UTC