- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 05:22:53 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24160 Bug ID: 24160 Summary: Should innerWidth/Height and company really be readonly? Product: CSS Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: CSSOM View Assignee: simonp@opera.com Reporter: bzbarsky@mit.edu QA Contact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org Or should they have a no-op setter? The difference is that readonly throws an exception on set in strict mode. This testcase: <script> "use strict"; try { window.innerWidth = 0; alert("REACHED"); } catch (e) { alert(e); } </script> alerts "REACHED" for me in IE9, Gecko, Presto, Blink, and WebKit, so it seems a bit worrisome to suddenly make this case throw... esp in quirks mode. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 23 December 2013 05:22:54 UTC