- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 05:22:53 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24160
Bug ID: 24160
Summary: Should innerWidth/Height and company really be
readonly?
Product: CSS
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: CSSOM View
Assignee: simonp@opera.com
Reporter: bzbarsky@mit.edu
QA Contact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
Or should they have a no-op setter? The difference is that readonly throws an
exception on set in strict mode.
This testcase:
<script>
"use strict";
try {
window.innerWidth = 0;
alert("REACHED");
} catch (e) { alert(e); }
</script>
alerts "REACHED" for me in IE9, Gecko, Presto, Blink, and WebKit, so it seems a
bit worrisome to suddenly make this case throw... esp in quirks mode.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 23 December 2013 05:22:54 UTC