- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:23:50 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16527
Summary: getFlowByName and shadow DOM
Product: CSS
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
URL: https://github.com/oslego/shadow-dom-regions
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Regions
AssignedTo: vhardy@adobe.com
ReportedBy: vhardy@adobe.com
QAContact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: eoconnor@apple.com
See the results of Razvan's experiment and the issue of accessing a named flow
and scoped styles. There is a conflict between having the named flow on the
Document and scoped shadow DOM branches.
The question is: should named flows be Document-wide (always) or be scoped as
the rest of the shadow styles?
One solution is to say that named flows are document-wide (always) and can be
referenced from scoped styles.
Another solution is to say that flows are scoped, and provide a solution to
give DOM access to scoped flows.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 26 March 2012 16:23:56 UTC