- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:04 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 Summary: same-sign flexibility in flexing algorithm Product: CSS Version: unspecified Platform: PC URL: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/ OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Flexbox AssignedTo: alexmog@microsoft.com ReportedBy: alexmog@microsoft.com QAContact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org CC: dbaron@dbaron.org, alexmog@microsoft.com Current flexing algorithm choses to use either positive or negative flexibility for all items, which helps to ensure it will finish with any combination of flexibility and min/max sizes. This approach doesn't allow to optimize layout by shrinking a large item that is far from both its min and its max sizes, and growing a small item that is close to its preferred size. It may be possible to get a better result by calculating penalties based on actual size change, flexibility settings and where there calculated size is relative to min/max/preferred sizes. Example to consider: <flexbox> <div style="flex:1 1 auto">long description of something important that is about to happen</div> <button style="flex:1 1 auto">I agree</button> </flexbox> -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 08:19:09 UTC