- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:58:47 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17513 --- Comment #1 from Anton P <antonsforums@yahoo.co.uk> 2012-06-16 12:58:47 UTC --- Simon Sapin notes that there are two different algorithms that could potentially apply: 10.3.7 Absolutely positioned, non-replaced elements 17.5.2 Table width algorithms: the 'table-layout' property (and sub-sections) and he suggests that a reasonable way to resolve the conflict is to combine them by taking the used width (the result) from 10.3.7 and pretending that it is the computed width (one of the "input") for the purpose of 17.5.2, and then keep *that* used value. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0447.html -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2012 12:58:49 UTC