- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 17:14:01 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16023 Summary: CSS3 Image and element() with 3D transforms? Product: CSS Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Transforms AssignedTo: smfr@me.com ReportedBy: dschulze@adobe.com QAContact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org CC: cmarrin@apple.com, eoconnor@apple.com, dino@apple.com, dschulze@adobe.com What if elements within element()[1] have 3D transforms? How would perspective interact with other content in HTML? For SVG I plan not to allow 3D transforms for pattern, gradients, mask and clipper, their childs and referenced resources of the childs. At first they are used by a 2D shape anyway. Beside pattern, all other operations are 2D anyway. Pattern could have 3D transformed childs, but we would have to specify perspective of a pattern in combination with perspective of the referencing target element. The amount can be to hard to specify and in my eyes impossible to overlook in the short time we have left to get to CR. And it is maybe even harder to implement. For this reason I would suggest to ignore all transform functions with 3D content on elements when they are in the rendering context of element(). [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#element-reference -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2012 17:14:04 UTC