- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:46:32 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16003 --- Comment #4 from Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> 2012-02-16 18:46:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > across browsers. I think we should keep the CSSOM stuff, but only the stuff > that actually has specs written for it (even if they're unstable or > inaccurate). Sorry, that makes no sense at all. On the one hand you say we don't need it because we can't access it. On the other hand you say we should leave it in the Spec? If we leave it in the Spec, why not making it really useful, instead of leaving it broken and not useful at all? -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 18:46:39 UTC