- From: Alison Maher via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 20:47:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
One additional thing to note is the relevant spec text at: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-2/#static-position > The [static position](https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#abs-non-replaced-width) [[CSS2]](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-2/#biblio-css2) of an absolutely-positioned child of a [grid container](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-2/#grid-container) is determined as if it were the sole grid item in a [grid area](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-2/#grid-area) whose edges coincide with the content edges of the grid container. Per this text, OOF items are not currently impacted by content alignment, but it isn't clear what should happen with reversals (as I think the question could apply to `track-reverse`, as well). I tend to agree that it would likely make sense for OOFs to honor reversals in these cases. -- GitHub Notification of comment by alisonmaher Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13931#issuecomment-4463481314 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 15 May 2026 20:47:09 UTC