- From: celestepan via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 20:37:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
celestepan has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-grid-3][masonry] Static positions of out-of-flow items in fill-reverse == In the case we are using fill-reverse on a grid-lanes container (ie either `grid-lanes-direction: row fill-reverse` or `grid-lanes-direction: column fill-reverse`), do we expect the static positions of the out-of-flow items to be reversed along the stacking axis as well? For example, for `column fill-reverse`, should the static position of the OOF item be at the end of the container, where the in-flow items are starting: <img width="500" height="321" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/732364b2-5d20-4d4c-af29-cc3e0c155303" /> or should the static position of the OOF item be at the start of the container: <img width="500" height="259" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b6af9d97-c0ad-4a9d-91e5-32973da867ad" /> I think it makes the most sense to have the static position of the out-of-flow items calibrate to wherever the rest of the in-flow items are starting, since the static position of an out-of-flow item represents where the item would be placed if it were in-flow. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13931 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 15 May 2026 20:37:59 UTC