- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 20:33:14 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> In browsers that don't support `image()`, can it be interpreted as `linear-gradient(transparent)`? No, that would be an observable behavior difference (and will, once WPTs are created, cause test failures). But I also, just this morning, editted our previous resolution to punt all the non-color uses of `image()` to Level 5, so the Images 4 version of `image()` is *just* `image( <color> )`, which is exactly equivalent to `linear-gradient( <color> )` and thus should be trivial to implement and ship alongside `light-dark()`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13866#issuecomment-4391897791 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2026 20:33:15 UTC