- From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 11:11:04 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
FWIW Firefox doesn't support none in `light-dark()` for this reason, and the discussion in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12513 and above seems to indicate it's not so trivial to consider `none` an image everywhere. I think it's probably fine to require authors to specify a valid `<image>` if they need to. A transparent image is as easy as `linear-gradient(transparent)`. Is the `none` use case strong enough to require special syntax? I'd rather do `image(none)` if we needed to, that'd be unambiguous. -- GitHub Notification of comment by emilio Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13866#issuecomment-4378680713 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2026 11:11:04 UTC