- From: Romain Menke via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2026 18:24:12 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I think these names are fine. ----- There isn't really any hint as to what the keywords do or why they are there. So it isn't possibly to intuit that these are inputs for a caching key. `random in this property` vs. `cached in this property` But any idea I have is fairly verbose: - `random(cache-key(--foo element), 1, 10)` - `random(key(--foo element), 1, 10)` - `random(cached --foo element, 1, 10)` - `random(--foo cached-per-element, 1, 10)` This is also why I think the proposal above is ok. Making the feature self documenting seems to make it very verbose and a lot of CSS has syntax that authors lookup every time they use it. -- GitHub Notification of comment by romainmenke Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13601#issuecomment-4006862980 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2026 18:24:13 UTC