- From: Alison Maher via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 22:15:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I would love to see option D from Florian in the mix. @nt1m my goal would be to limit the options we present in the outreach as much as possible to avoid overloading things too much. If we'd like to consider option D, I'm open to it, but it may be helpful to narrow down to either B1 or D before doing the outreach to keep things as simple as we can. Of course, we can always include more options if we can't narrow it down to 2; it just would mean a longer video and more info for devs to have to parse through. > Also, I think basic use-cases that don't require grid-lanes-direction/grid-auto-flow should also be represented in that content as not needing the property and being the same for both proposals (to not mislead folks unfamiliar with the technology). Yep, providing a quick overview of grid-lanes and a simple example relying just on the `normal` default is something we already have as part of the initial plan to ensure there is enough context before diving into the open question. -- GitHub Notification of comment by alisonmaher Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12803#issuecomment-3762014712 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 16 January 2026 22:15:51 UTC