- From: Alison Maher via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:32:22 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I’ve been discussing with @captainbrosset ways to gather broader developer feedback on the proposed syntaxes. I’d like to add this issue to the agenda for a short, time‑boxed discussion to confirm whether the group is comfortable with the proposed outreach plan. To make the issue more accessible to developers, we’re considering a short video that outlines the two leading proposals (A and B1), including concrete examples of each, so authors don’t need to read the full thread to understand the trade‑offs. We would then follow up with a simple poll to gauge which option feels more intuitive. The goal is to get a quick pulse from external developers to help gather more data points as part of the larger discussion. If the plan sounds reasonable, we would be happy to review the video script with interested parties ahead of time to ensure that the video properly captures all the right pieces of information for both proposals. -- GitHub Notification of comment by alisonmaher Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12803#issuecomment-3760855940 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 16 January 2026 16:32:23 UTC