- From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2026 08:35:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I think it would already help if the definition of _content image_ began with “A replaced element of …”. By the way, I just realized, that most modules still point to [CSS2](https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/conform.html#replaced-element) when they reference the term _replaced element_ (which they often don’t do with a link), although [css-display](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display/#replaced-element) offers a more recent definition (albeit in the glossary in Annex A). -- GitHub Notification of comment by Crissov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13440#issuecomment-3903752824 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 15 February 2026 08:35:10 UTC