- From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 16:27:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Crissov has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-image-animation] Definition of content and == > - **content image** > An element of the host language representing a static image or an animated image, at the exclusion of videos or programmatic images. > > - **decorative image** > An image inserted into the document rendering by CSS, through such properties as `background-image` or `border-image`. This leaves open to interpretation which of these two definitions an image included with the `content` property falls into, especially if used with `attr()` to retrieve the resource location from the host document – this is currently not specified to work author-side, but is the logical browser-side implementation in CSS of replaced elements that represent an image as defined by the host language. I also note that the term _replaced element_ is not used even once in the draft and the CSS type [`<image>`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-images-3/#typedef-image) is not referenced anywhere either. As far as I can tell, neither the CSS Images nor the Backgrounds module prohibits files using a video format within `<image>`, so it is hard to argue for this module not covering `<video>` as well. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13440 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2026 16:27:09 UTC