- From: sideshowbarker via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 20:26:40 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> > I think we're fine. GH-flavored markdown's only real innovation […] > > I am more concerned about incompatibilities. Conpare the rendering of this file: GH: [webplatformco/project-image-animation@`main`/image-animation-property/README.md](https://github.com/webplatformco/project-image-animation/blob/main/image-animation-property/README.md?rgh-link-date=2026-02-04T15%3A17%3A32Z) python: [drafts.csswg.org/css-image-animation-1/explainer](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-image-animation-1/explainer) Yipes yeah that’s awful > The legacy server used [CommonMark](https://pypi.org/project/commonmark/) OK see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/13448. https://github.com/readthedocs/commonmark.py appears to be archived and no longer maintained. So, switching the GitHub-supported CommonMark successor would seem to be the best choice. -- GitHub Notification of comment by sideshowbarker Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/13432#issuecomment-3849581227 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2026 20:26:42 UTC