- From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2026 23:01:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Crissov has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-values] Rename `inherit()` to `parental()`, add more `inherit`-like variant as `inherit()` == [Comments](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2864#issuecomment-3404593711) tend to be overlooked after an issue has been closed, like #2864 was. Therefore, reraising as a separate topic. The [`inherit()` function](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-5/#inherit-notation) should behave more like the [`inherit` global keywords](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-5/#inherit-notation) in that it always refers to the **same (custom, computed) property** it is used within! That means, drop the first parameter, thus only expect an optional fallback value within the functional notation. For accessing ancestral values from **arbitrary properties**, there should be a separate function, called something like `parent()` or `parental()`. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13426 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 1 February 2026 23:01:46 UTC