Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3] Masonry Switch Syntax (#12022)

I also want to voice my support for `staggered-grid`. It's the first proposal I've seen where I immediately thought, "Oh yeah, that makes sense." 

I also think a single keyword is better. As @diondiondion said, it once again becomes dependent on first declaring `display: grid` and then opting in. If that's the case, why not keep `display: grid` as is and go back to `grid-template-columns: collapse/flow/staggered` at that point? It feels like the same thing but with an extra step, as you'd still have to declare which axis is the staggered one.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kevin-powell
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12022#issuecomment-3334326242 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 25 September 2025 14:07:21 UTC