- From: Sam Weinig via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:07:21 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
weinig has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-anchor-position-1] Minor correct to the grammar for `position-try-fallbacks` == I think the grammar for [`position-try-fallbacks`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#propdef-position-try-fallbacks) probably wants to use `<position-area>` not `<'position-area'>`, as the latter allows `none`. -- More details: The grammar for [`position-try-fallbacks`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#propdef-position-try-fallbacks) is currently: ``` <'position-try-fallbacks'> = none | [ [<dashed-ident> || <try-tactic>] | <'position-area'> ]# ``` And the grammar for [`<'position-area'>`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#propdef-position-area) is: ``` <'position-area'> = none | <position-area> ``` Combined, this means that `position-try-fallbacks` allows something like `flip-block, none, none, none`. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12838 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 22 September 2025 00:07:22 UTC