- From: Kurt Catti-Schmidt via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:47:31 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
KurtCattiSchmidt has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-cascade-7] CSS @sheet - is there a need for an @sheet statement (in addition to block)? == CSS layers allow for both statements with rules: ``` @layer foo { h1, h2 { color: maroon; background: white;} } ``` https://www.w3.org/TR/css-cascade-5/#layer-block ...and without: ``` @layer default, theme, components; ``` https://www.w3.org/TR/css-cascade-5/#layer-empty Does it make sense to follow this convention for `@sheet`? My initial take is "no", because `@sheet` only makes sense with both an identifier and a ruleset. If there's no identifier, the rules defined in the sheet can't be applied, and if there's no ruleset, it doesn't have any rules to apply, and thus doesn't do anything. `@layer` is different, because initial declaration of a layer impacts the cascade order. With `@sheet` identifiers are only used for embedding later, so I don't see any use case for reserving a name for later. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11998 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 24 March 2025 17:47:32 UTC