- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 21:10:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> * We agree with adding a source-order value to `reading-flow` to contrast with the initial value. `reading-flow: none` seems a bit odd, though. (Personally I think something like `source-order` vs `normal` would be pretty clear, but open to suggestions.) +1 on using a different keyword for this than `none`. There is always a reading order for the elements. So `none` seems wrong to me as it indicates that there is no order whatsoever. `source-order` sounds fine, or maybe `element-order`. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11396#issuecomment-2702085069 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2025 21:10:51 UTC