- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 05:50:16 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
- We agree with adding a source-order value to `reading-flow` to contrast with the initial value. `reading-flow: none` seems a bit odd, though. (Personally I think something like `source-order` vs `normal` would be pretty clear, but open to suggestions.) - We don't think `dense` packing should cause reordering of everything in a grid container. This would be unexpected, and likely break existing pages. If it's to have an effect by default, it should limit itself only to changing the position of the backfilled items wrt other items, not shuffling everything. This is a particularly important consideration for pages that mix auto-placed items with more specifically placed items, and are relying on the source order to make sense for at least some of those items. See e.g. https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11396#issuecomment-2686405286 - In general, this discussion would benefit from more complex real-world and creative examples. A lot of the discussion of `reading-flow` etc. has focused on very simple teaching examples, which don't do enough to inform our decisions. For example, the proposal in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11396#issuecomment-2686405286 is perfectly reasonable in a grid container that has only auto-placed items; but breaks down when the grid's content is more complex. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11396#issuecomment-2699936616 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2025 05:50:17 UTC