- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 11:00:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
OK, I missed the testcase from the issue was using `all` on the same element. But I still don't see what's especial about `interactivity` to exclude it from `all`. The proposal just seems a hacky band-aid to mitigate the effects of the HTML change. Maybe the `inert` attribute could set `interactivity: inert !important` preshint, or maybe not set a preshint at all and just affect how `interactivity: auto` resolves. Or just accept the breakage. After all, `all: unset` can undo the effect of lots of HTML attributes, e.g. ```html <!DOCTYPE html> <div hidden>I'm hidden</div> <div hidden style="all: unset">I'm visible</div> ``` ```html <!DOCTYPE html> <img src="image" width="1000"> <!-- 1000px wide --> <img src="image" width="1000" style="all: unset"> <!-- Probably not 1000px wide --> ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12049#issuecomment-2995967257 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 23 June 2025 11:00:01 UTC