Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-borders-4] corner-shape initial value ("round") is strange in some cases (e.g. bevel) (#11623)

> There wasn't an example of this given in the thread yet, but squircle corners would definitely be best falling back to "round".

There _is_ an example of squircles above: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11623#issuecomment-2914500797

As stated there while `round` can be a good fallback shape for `squircle` the radius/size value might need to be different from `squircle` to `round`.

I guess the other thing to keep in mind is that hopefully any issues with fallback for unsupported browsers won't be around that long. The only issue that would remain long term is questions like "why is CSS asking for the radius of a notch or an angle".

Very much agree that there should be a `corners` shorthand.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by jsnkuhn
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11623#issuecomment-2932902135 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 2 June 2025 23:42:11 UTC